News & Blog

Readercon: The Monday Morning Quarterbacks Have Arrived

There are two points I’d like to establish before getting to the meat of this entry.

1) There are numerous eyewitnesses to Rene Walling’s harassment of Genevieve Valentine at Readercon. There are others who have come forward to show that Walling has a history of stalking and harassing women at conventions. The Readercon Board itself says, in its statement, that the facts are not in dispute. Walling himself admitted to his behavior when he apologized to the Board. Put simply, there is no doubt whatsoever about what happened. Zero. None.

2) Genevieve Valentine behaved in the best possible way one could under those circumstances. She firmly and unequivocally told Walling not to touch her and to leave her alone. When he chose not to respect that, she took herself out of the situation and followed protocol, namely contacting the Readercon committee to report Walling’s harassment, confident that their zero tolerance policy would enable them to handle it swiftly and without question. In fact, Valentine has behaved remarkably calm and cool in the face of the Readercon Board’s betrayal of her, everyone else at the convention who wanted a safe place, and their own existing policy. I don’t think she has so much as used an exclamation point in most of the replies she has written to people’s comments on her blog. Instead, she routinely thanks them for their support and voices her hope that things can be made right.

The support Valentine has received from all over the Internet, and thus all over the world, has been amazing. A veritable flood of voices backing her up. Unfortunately, there has been some — not a lot, but some — Monday morning quarterbacking out there, too, as if any of the facts are still in dispute. We’ve heard from the armchair psychiatrists (“It sounds to my completely untrained mind like Walling is on the Autism spectrum; I bet he was just having trouble reading social cues!”), the armchair anthropologists (“Walling is French Canadian and they’re so touchy-feely, this whole thing is just a cross-cultural misunderstanding!”), the armchair jurists (“I don’t care what anyone says, I need to see transcripts and video tapes of the alleged harassment before I decide what actually happened!”), and the armchair psychics (“I don’t know either of the parties involved, but I’m sure Mr. Walling didn’t mean anything and Ms. Valentine is totally overreacting!”).

Among these mental midgets who believe that because the target was a woman she must be wrong somehow in her assessment of what happened (because it’s not like women deal with harassment all the damn time, right?) is a man named Peter Huston, who has written a blog entry that is the most blatant and desperate a cry for attention I’ve seen since the relatively unknown author Dwight Allen wrote an essay for the Los Angeles Review of Books about how he doesn’t like Stephen King books and so no one else should, either. Alas, the Internet is built to give just these sorts of idiots the attention they crave, and were I a better man, I wouldn’t waste any pixels on Mr. Huston. But I am not a better man. Mr. Huston is an armchair psychiatrist, an armchair anthropologist, an armchair jurist, and an armchair psychic all wrapped up in one, like some kind of superhuman! To whit, here are some choice excerpts from his blog entry:

[After Readercon violated its own lifetime ban policy regarding harassment] Throughout the North American blogosphere one of those self-righteous, PC mobs was forming, demanding complete conformity with its thoughts along the way, and seeking blood or at least permanent banishment from Readercon for life for the alleged sexual harasser.

Ah, the old PC bugaboo. The last refuge of people who can’t articulate their own position. Mostly because they don’t actually know what they’re talking about. For Huston, it only takes until the second paragraph for him to raise the dreaded specter of the PC hordes. And they’re after blood! That’s the worst kind of PC mob! A vampire PC mob! And they’re coming to take away the rights of harassers…or something! Man, Huston’s victim fantasies are pretty elaborate. He should call this one I Am Legend 2: The Harassening. Here’s another choice bit:

Although the mob and the convention say “the facts are not in dispute” no one has actually said if they agree that the facts below are the ones agreed upon. But I’ll use them anyway because they are the only facts I have. 

There are facts, and then there are facts, people! The facts may not be in dispute, but what facts? That the sky is blue? That the Earth revolves around the sun? I, Peter Huston, must know which facts they discussed in their private meetings about the incident, because THIS IS ALL ABOUT ME AND WHAT I NEED! (Uh, no. Refer to point #1 above.)

[Valentine] can’t communicate with [Walling] who is giving her unwanted attention, but can communicate with her friends about how she is so allegedly desirable that men cannot control themsleves around her. I’ve seen this before. Although I do not know the alleged victim, and have never even met her, it is a sign of a couple different diagnosable personality disorders –borderline and histrionic, look it up. If she’s got the latter, wait ten to twenty years and she’ll be seeking attention due to bizarre medical maladies that only she can detect.

Despite not knowing her, he is able to diagnose her personality with laser-like precision! Valentine is a shrieking hysteric! (Oh, wait. Refer to point #2 above.) Also, don’t forget, folks, sexual harassment makes you feel sexy! All it takes is one stranger grabbing you in a hallway, and suddenly you feel like Brigitte Bardot! Am I right, ladies? High five!

[From Valentine’s blog] And when you have offended a woman with boundary-crossing behavior, you do not get to choose how you apologize.

ME: (Fuck you Bitch. –Yeah, I used the “B word.” But we both know you were going to accuse me of sexism and insensitivity anyway so I just decided to make your life a little easier when you do. Do too. And, as you have proven in this silly document, there’s not a darn thing you can do about it. AND IT’S NOT BECAUSE YOU ARE A WOMAN –IT’S BECAUSE YOU HAVE SHOWN YOURSELF NOT TO BE A FUNCTIONING ADULT WHO CAN DEAL WITH SIMPLE SOCIAL INTERACTIONS THAT HAPPEN TO ALL PEOPLE ALL THE TIME., YOU LIVE IN A FANTASY WORLD AND WHEN YOU LIVE IN A FANTASY WORLD THEN REALITY OFTEN INTRUDES LEAVING THE PERSON FEELING CONFUSED, UNCOMFORTABLE AND TRYING TO CHANGE THE ENTIRE PLANET SO THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO YOUR FANTASY.

And laaaaadies, he’s siiiingle! *wiggles eyebrows*

See What You’re Missing By Not Following the Readercon Discussions?

Among the things I learned today: French Canadians are literally unable to stop grabbing people inappropriately, and “Aspies” are all rapists but it’s OK because they don’t know any better. Thanks, Internet! I look forward to tomorrow’s lesson!

World Fantasy 2012 — It’s Official

First, thanks to everyone who took the poll over at my LiveJournal! The overwhelming majority of you agreed that I should attend World Fantasy 2012 in Toronto — mainly because it would be my one and only opportunity to sleep on Simon Strantzas‘ couch.

But whatever! It’s official! I am attending World Fantasy 2012! I can’t wait to see everyone there!

Not Cool, Readercon — Part 2

Here is a copy of the email I sent the Readercon board tonight:

from: Nicholas Kaufmann nick.kaufmann@gmail.com
to: info@readercon.org
date: Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 8:13 PM
subject: Re: Rene Walling

Dear Readercon Board,

I am deeply disappointed in the way the situation regarding Rene Walling’s repeated harassment of Genevieve Valentine at this year’s Readercon has been handled. Aside from violating your own zero-tolerance policy toward harassment, a policy I heretofore applauded Readercon for implementing, and which I now see is not zero-tolerance at all, I find the Board’s decision to ban Mr. Walling for only two years, instead of permanently as proscribed in the policy, incredibly short-sighted.

I presume you believe that Mr. Walling will spend those two years at a finishing school, where he will learn to act courteously and respectfully toward others, and return to Readercon in 2015 a new man who has learned his lesson. Instead, the only lesson you have taught Mr. Walling is that he can do as he pleases and skate by with little more than a slap on the wrists. By contrast, the lesson you have taught the rest of us is that you do not take your attending membership’s safety and comfort seriously.

My wife and I have enjoyed coming to Readercon for the past two years, but we no longer feel the need to attend a convention where our safety and comfort are not taken seriously. We are not alone in feeling this way, either. I’m sure you’ve already noticed all the outraged and astonished comments from Readercon attendees on Twitter, Facebook, Livejournal, Google+, and elsewhere. But I can only speak for us when I say that we will not be returning to Readercon until this situation is rectified and you stand by your stated policy and ban Mr. Walling permanently. Because otherwise, next time, emboldened by the favored status you have granted him, Mr. Walling will have no reason to comport himself properly, and this will all happen again. At Readercon. Under your watch. Just as it did this time. So I suppose the question is, do you want to handle this properly now, or do you want to have to deal with it all over again, in a much more compounded manner, later? Because it takes a lot to make people who act this way stop acting this way, and a slap on the wrist won’t do it.

Genevieve Valentine is a talented author and well-liked personality who is a valuable asset to Readercon. You may have lost her already because of this. How many more are you willing to lose just so you can coddle someone who, by your own admission, broke your own rules?

Sincerely,
Nicholas Kaufmann
www.nicholaskaufmann.com

While I was writing it, the Readercon Board came out with their own public statement, which you can see here. If you’re wondering why Mr. Walling was banned for only two years instead of permanently, let me spoil it for you now: He’s really, really sorry. Whoopsie! Guess he shouldn’t have followed her around like a stalker after all, or said weird things to her about the naughty thoughts she was putting in his head, or put his arms around her from behind in a surprise hug in a crowded hallway, or then followed her around some more insisting he only wanted to apologize despite repeatedly being told to leave her alone. But I’m sure he’ll never, ever do it again, because he’s super duper sorry.

My Readercon stance remains as I wrote above. Either they rectify this egregiousness, or I never go to Readercon again.

 

Archives

Search